China high quality Gdk Part Number Jcb991/00147p Type Backhoe Loader with Free Design Custom

Product Description

GDK Part Number JCB991/00147P Type Backhoe Loader

Materiel: PTFE+NBR+PU+Ny

Special order: Require for other size or material, please contact us for further discussion about new CZPT and price.
Please send me 3 details about your engine application In order to give you fast and accurate pricing information.

  1. The Part Number
  2. The Centimeter Size
  3. Quantity

We set up the PTFE polymer materials, PU polyurethane and NBR materials seals producing line; Meanwhile, NOK, SKF, PARKER, CFW brand seals are also supplied well as the distributor in China.
All sealing products are widely used in different kinds of excavator and breaker hammer installation and maintenance systems, wining high reputation from the customers at home and abroad.
  

S/N CODE/ DESCRIPTION / SIZE
 
1 JCB 2002 NEW MODEL 550-41000 STABILIZER KIT
2 JCB 2002 NEW MODEL 550-41001 L.SHOVEL KIT
3 JCB 2002 NEW MODEL 550-41002 STEERING KIT
4 JCB 2002 NEW MODEL 550-41003 BUCKET KIT
5 JCB 2002 NEW MODEL 550-41004 SLEW KIT
6 JCB 2002 NEW MODEL 550-41008 LIFT KIT
7 JCB 2002 NEW MODEL 550-30444 DIPPER KIT
8 JCB 2002 NEW MODEL 550-4571 DIPPER KIT
9 JCB 2012 991-10142 SLEW KIT
10 JCB 2013 333/Y-6571 KIT
11 JCB 2013 333/Y-6571 DIPPER KIT
12 JCB 2013 333/Y-6571 BOOM KIT
13 JCB 2013 332/Y-8994 BUCKET KIT
14 JCB 2013 333/Y-9235 STEERING KIT
15 JCB 3DX 130-15110 STABILIZER KIT
16 JCB 3DX 130-15167 BOOM KIT
17 JCB 3DX 130-15089 STEERING KIT
18 JCB 3DX 130-15106 LIFT KIT
19 JCB 3DX 130-15107 BUCKET KIT
20 JCB 3DX 130-15168 DIPPER KIT
21 JCB 3DX 2003 550-42085 BOOM KIT
22 JCB 3DX 2003 550-42126 STABILIZER KIT
23 JCB 3DX 2003 550-42112 BUCKET KIT
24 JCB 3DX 2003 550-42098 DIPPER KIT
25 JCB 3DX NEW 2005 550-42854 BOOM KIT
26 JCB 3DX NEW 2005 550-42261 SLEW KIT
27 JCB 3DX NEW 2005 550-42383 STEERING KIT
28 JCB 3DX NEW 2005 550-42849 STABILIZER KIT
29 JCB 3DX NEW 2005 550-42835 L.SHOVEL KIT
30 JCB 3DX NEW 2005 550-42842 LIFT KIT
31 JCB 3DX NEW 2005 550-42855 BUCKET KIT
32 JCB 3DX NEW 2005 550-42847 DIPPER KIT
33 JCB 3DX 332/Y7633 SEAL KIT
34 JCB 4DX  550/42909 DIPPER KIT
35 JCB 4DX  550/35719 BOOM KIT
36 JCB 4DX  550/42904 STABILIZER KIT
37 JCB 4DX  550/41860 BUCKET KIT
38 JCB BLACK 2009 NEW MODEL  332/Y-5599 STABILIZER KIT
39 JCB BLACK 2009 NEW MODEL  332/Y-6192 DIPPER KIT
40 JCB BLACK 2009 NEW MODEL  332/Y-6440 BOOM KIT
41 JCB BLACK 2009 NEW MODEL  332/Y-6194 BOOM KIT
42 JCB BLACK 2009 NEW MODEL  332/Y-3519 STABILIZER KIT
43 JCB BLACK 2009 NEW MODEL  332/Y-3543 L.SHOVEL KIT
44 JCB BLACK 2009 NEW MODEL  332/Y-2186 LIFT KIT
45 JCB BLACK 2009 NEW MODEL  550/43774 LIFT KIT
46 JCB BLACK 2009 NEW MODEL  332/Y-6519 BUCKET KIT
47 JCB BLACK 2009 NEW MODEL  332/Y-6195 BUCKET KIT
48 JCB BLACK 2009 NEW MODEL  332/Y-6462 DIPPER KIT
       
49 L&T 770 SSP4216 Boom seal kit
50 L&T 770 SSP4217 Dipper seal kit
51 L&T 770 SSP4218 Seal kit
52 L&T 770 SSP4219 Seal kit
53 L&T 770 SSP4220 Lift seal kit
54 L&T 770 SSP4221 Tilt seal kit
55 L&T 770 SSP4222 Swing seal kit
56 L&T 770 SSP6889 Dipper seal kit
57 L&T 770 SSP6188 Swing seal kit
58 L&T 770 SSP6287 Stab seal kit
59 L&T 770 DC7310/650 Seal kit
60 L&T CASE DC7309/650 Boom seal kit
61 L&T CASE DC7305/650 Seal kit
62 L&T 770 DC7308/650 Dental seal kit
63 L&T 770 DC650/7454 Stab seal kit
64 L&T 770 DC650/7306 Bucket seal kit
65 L&T 770 DC650/7307 Lift seal kit
66 L&T 770 SSP7385 Tilt seal kit
67 TRX-760 SSP5095 Streering 
68 TRX-760 SSP5088 Dipper seal kit
69 TRX-760 SSP5092 L.BKT seal kit
70 TRX-760 SSP5093 Swing seal kit
71 TX760 SSP5087 Boom seal kit
72 TX760 SSP5089 Bucket seal kit
73 TEREX740 SSP8130 Seal kit
74 TEREX740 SSP8990 Seal kit
75 TEREX740 SSP7942 Dipper seal kit
76 TEREX SSP7214 Slew Seal Kit
77 L&T 770 DC650/7303 Lift seal kit
       
78 3CX JCB 991/00095 Repair seal kit
79 3CX JCB 991/00098 Repair seal kit
80 3CX JCB 991/00099 Repair seal kit
81 3CX JCB 991/5710 Repair seal kit
82 3CX JCB 991/5712 Repair seal kit
83 3CX JCB 991/5713 Repair seal kit
84 3CX JCB 991/00110 Repair seal kit
85 3CX JCB 991/00115 Repair seal kit
86 3CX JCB 991/00145 Repair seal kit
87 3CX JCB 991/00147 Repair seal kit
88 3CX JCB 991/00147P Repair seal kit
89 3CX JCB 991/00148 Repair seal kit
90 3CX JCB 991/00152 Repair seal kit
91 3CX JCB 991/00152P Repair seal kit
92 3CX JCB 991/00156 Repair seal kit
93 3CX JCB 991/10152 Repair seal kit
94 3CX JCB 991/20571 Repair seal kit
95 3CX JCB 991/20571 Repair seal kit
96 3CX JCB 991/2571 Repair seal kit
97 3CX JCB 991/20030 Repair seal kit
98 3CX JCB 991-00130 Repair seal kit
99 3CX JCB 991-00131 Repair seal kit
100 3CX JCB 991-00127 Repair seal kit
101 3CX JCB 991-00122 Repair seal kit
102 3CX JCB 991-00123 Repair seal kit
103 3CX JCB 991/00036 Repair seal kit
104 3CX JCB 991/20013 Repair seal kit

Stiffness and Torsional Vibration of Spline-Couplings

In this paper, we describe some basic characteristics of spline-coupling and examine its torsional vibration behavior. We also explore the effect of spline misalignment on rotor-spline coupling. These results will assist in the design of improved spline-coupling systems for various applications. The results are presented in Table 1.
splineshaft

Stiffness of spline-coupling

The stiffness of a spline-coupling is a function of the meshing force between the splines in a rotor-spline coupling system and the static vibration displacement. The meshing force depends on the coupling parameters such as the transmitting torque and the spline thickness. It increases nonlinearly with the spline thickness.
A simplified spline-coupling model can be used to evaluate the load distribution of splines under vibration and transient loads. The axle spline sleeve is displaced a z-direction and a resistance moment T is applied to the outer face of the sleeve. This simple model can satisfy a wide range of engineering requirements but may suffer from complex loading conditions. Its asymmetric clearance may affect its engagement behavior and stress distribution patterns.
The results of the simulations show that the maximum vibration acceleration in both Figures 10 and 22 was 3.03 g/s. This results indicate that a misalignment in the circumferential direction increases the instantaneous impact. Asymmetry in the coupling geometry is also found in the meshing. The right-side spline’s teeth mesh tightly while those on the left side are misaligned.
Considering the spline-coupling geometry, a semi-analytical model is used to compute stiffness. This model is a simplified form of a classical spline-coupling model, with submatrices defining the shape and stiffness of the joint. As the design clearance is a known value, the stiffness of a spline-coupling system can be analyzed using the same formula.
The results of the simulations also show that the spline-coupling system can be modeled using MASTA, a high-level commercial CAE tool for transmission analysis. In this case, the spline segments were modeled as a series of spline segments with variable stiffness, which was calculated based on the initial gap between spline teeth. Then, the spline segments were modelled as a series of splines of increasing stiffness, accounting for different manufacturing variations. The resulting analysis of the spline-coupling geometry is compared to those of the finite-element approach.
Despite the high stiffness of a spline-coupling system, the contact status of the contact surfaces often changes. In addition, spline coupling affects the lateral vibration and deformation of the rotor. However, stiffness nonlinearity is not well studied in splined rotors because of the lack of a fully analytical model.
splineshaft

Characteristics of spline-coupling

The study of spline-coupling involves a number of design factors. These include weight, materials, and performance requirements. Weight is particularly important in the aeronautics field. Weight is often an issue for design engineers because materials have varying dimensional stability, weight, and durability. Additionally, space constraints and other configuration restrictions may require the use of spline-couplings in certain applications.
The main parameters to consider for any spline-coupling design are the maximum principal stress, the maldistribution factor, and the maximum tooth-bearing stress. The magnitude of each of these parameters must be smaller than or equal to the external spline diameter, in order to provide stability. The outer diameter of the spline must be at least 4 inches larger than the inner diameter of the spline.
Once the physical design is validated, the spline coupling knowledge base is created. This model is pre-programmed and stores the design parameter signals, including performance and manufacturing constraints. It then compares the parameter values to the design rule signals, and constructs a geometric representation of the spline coupling. A visual model is created from the input signals, and can be manipulated by changing different parameters and specifications.
The stiffness of a spline joint is another important parameter for determining the spline-coupling stiffness. The stiffness distribution of the spline joint affects the rotor’s lateral vibration and deformation. A finite element method is a useful technique for obtaining lateral stiffness of spline joints. This method involves many mesh refinements and requires a high computational cost.
The diameter of the spline-coupling must be large enough to transmit the torque. A spline with a larger diameter may have greater torque-transmitting capacity because it has a smaller circumference. However, the larger diameter of a spline is thinner than the shaft, and the latter may be more suitable if the torque is spread over a greater number of teeth.
Spline-couplings are classified according to their tooth profile along the axial and radial directions. The radial and axial tooth profiles affect the component’s behavior and wear damage. Splines with a crowned tooth profile are prone to angular misalignment. Typically, these spline-couplings are oversized to ensure durability and safety.

Stiffness of spline-coupling in torsional vibration analysis

This article presents a general framework for the study of torsional vibration caused by the stiffness of spline-couplings in aero-engines. It is based on a previous study on spline-couplings. It is characterized by the following 3 factors: bending stiffness, total flexibility, and tangential stiffness. The first criterion is the equivalent diameter of external and internal splines. Both the spline-coupling stiffness and the displacement of splines are evaluated by using the derivative of the total flexibility.
The stiffness of a spline joint can vary based on the distribution of load along the spline. Variables affecting the stiffness of spline joints include the torque level, tooth indexing errors, and misalignment. To explore the effects of these variables, an analytical formula is developed. The method is applicable for various kinds of spline joints, such as splines with multiple components.
Despite the difficulty of calculating spline-coupling stiffness, it is possible to model the contact between the teeth of the shaft and the hub using an analytical approach. This approach helps in determining key magnitudes of coupling operation such as contact peak pressures, reaction moments, and angular momentum. This approach allows for accurate results for spline-couplings and is suitable for both torsional vibration and structural vibration analysis.
The stiffness of spline-coupling is commonly assumed to be rigid in dynamic models. However, various dynamic phenomena associated with spline joints must be captured in high-fidelity drivetrain models. To accomplish this, a general analytical stiffness formulation is proposed based on a semi-analytical spline load distribution model. The resulting stiffness matrix contains radial and tilting stiffness values as well as torsional stiffness. The analysis is further simplified with the blockwise inversion method.
It is essential to consider the torsional vibration of a power transmission system before selecting the coupling. An accurate analysis of torsional vibration is crucial for coupling safety. This article also discusses case studies of spline shaft wear and torsionally-induced failures. The discussion will conclude with the development of a robust and efficient method to simulate these problems in real-life scenarios.
splineshaft

Effect of spline misalignment on rotor-spline coupling

In this study, the effect of spline misalignment in rotor-spline coupling is investigated. The stability boundary and mechanism of rotor instability are analyzed. We find that the meshing force of a misaligned spline coupling increases nonlinearly with spline thickness. The results demonstrate that the misalignment is responsible for the instability of the rotor-spline coupling system.
An intentional spline misalignment is introduced to achieve an interference fit and zero backlash condition. This leads to uneven load distribution among the spline teeth. A further spline misalignment of 50um can result in rotor-spline coupling failure. The maximum tensile root stress shifted to the left under this condition.
Positive spline misalignment increases the gear mesh misalignment. Conversely, negative spline misalignment has no effect. The right-handed spline misalignment is opposite to the helix hand. The high contact area is moved from the center to the left side. In both cases, gear mesh is misaligned due to deflection and tilting of the gear under load.
This variation of the tooth surface is measured as the change in clearance in the transverse plain. The radial and axial clearance values are the same, while the difference between the 2 is less. In addition to the frictional force, the axial clearance of the splines is the same, which increases the gear mesh misalignment. Hence, the same procedure can be used to determine the frictional force of a rotor-spline coupling.
Gear mesh misalignment influences spline-rotor coupling performance. This misalignment changes the distribution of the gear mesh and alters contact and bending stresses. Therefore, it is essential to understand the effects of misalignment in spline couplings. Using a simplified system of helical gear pair, Hong et al. examined the load distribution along the tooth interface of the spline. This misalignment caused the flank contact pattern to change. The misaligned teeth exhibited deflection under load and developed a tilting moment on the gear.
The effect of spline misalignment in rotor-spline couplings is minimized by using a mechanism that reduces backlash. The mechanism comprises cooperably splined male and female members. One member is formed by 2 coaxially aligned splined segments with end surfaces shaped to engage in sliding relationship. The connecting device applies axial loads to these segments, causing them to rotate relative to 1 another.

China high quality Gdk Part Number Jcb991/00147p Type Backhoe Loader     with Free Design CustomChina high quality Gdk Part Number Jcb991/00147p Type Backhoe Loader     with Free Design Custom